
This method is preferred in situations where the direct write-off method simplicity of recording actual losses outweighs the need for accurate matching of revenue and expenses. The alternative to the direct write off method is to create a provision for bad debts in the same period that you recognize revenue, which is based upon an estimate of what bad debts will be. This approach matches revenues with expenses, so that all aspects of a sale are included within a single reporting period. Conversely, the direct write-off method might involve a delay of several months between the initial sale and a charge to bad debt expense, which does not provide a complete view of a transaction within one reporting period. Therefore, the allowance method is considered the more acceptable accounting method. For example, a company may recognize $1 million in sales in one period, and then wait three or four months to collect all of the related accounts receivable, before finally charging some bad debts off to expense.

Balance Sheet Method for Calculating Bad Debt Expenses
Note that allowance for doubtful accounts reduces the overall accounts receivable account, not a specific accounts receivable assigned to a customer. The allowance method is the more widely used method because it satisfies the matching principle. The allowance method estimates bad debt during a period, based on certain computational approaches.
Financial Reporting and Disclosure
Even if you switch to the allowance method, make sure you track bad debt carefully, so that it’s easier for you to declare the correct value when it’s tax season. Using online software to help you manage your invoices might prove useful, so that you don’t need to go through paper invoices and receipts to determine if you need a tax deduction. Therefore, for smaller businesses that deal with simple product sales, the direct write-off method could be the best fit for you. Better yet, you don’t need to worry about coming up with the right number if you need to declare bad debt to the IRS. If you use the direct write-off method to manage bad debt, you already have that number ready when you file your business’s taxes. Otherwise, you’ll have to go back through your records again to come up with the number.
Accounts Payable Solutions

The estimated amount is debited from the Bad Debts Expense and credited to an Allowance for Doubtful Accounts to maintain balance. The direct write-off method does not comply with the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), according to the Houston Chronicle. Used by public and private companies that need to comply with GAAP and other accounting standards. The direct write-off method is certainly simple, but it also comes with a few drawbacks that can impact the accuracy and reliability of your financial reporting. Below are some key disadvantages that you should consider before relying on the direct write-off method. The direct write-off method may not be the perfect solution for every business, but it definitely has its perks.
Discuss the Impact of Bad Debt on a Company’s Income Statement and Balance Sheet

By setting aside a reserve based on a percentage of sales adjusted for customer risk, companies ensure a more accurate representation of their financial health. This reserve acts as a buffer against expected losses, aligning bad debt expenses with the sales they relate to within the same reporting period. This matching principle provides readers of financial statements with a clearer insight into the actual profitability tied to those sales, fostering transparency and accuracy in assessing a company’s performance. When a company initially estimates and recognizes bad debt expense, it must record the expense in the accounting period in which the related sales occurred. This ensures compliance with the matching principle of GAAP, which requires that expenses be matched with the revenues they help generate.

This framework dictates how businesses must handle the expense related to customer non-payment, forcing a choice between the simpler direct write-off method and the more complex allowance QuickBooks method. Bad Debt Expense increases (debit), and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts increases (credit) for $48,727.50 ($324,850 × 15%). The following table reflects how the relationship would be reflected in the current (short-term) section of the company’s Balance Sheet. As you’ve learned, the delayed recognition of bad debt violates GAAP, specifically the matching principle. Therefore, the direct write-off method is not used for publicly traded company reporting; the allowance method is used instead. By using the allowance method, companies align their financial statements more closely with the economic realities of credit sales, thereby improving the reliability and usefulness of their financial data.
- The amount of a write-off for the uncollectible accounts receivable is thus a bad debt expense to a company.
- The Direct Write-Off Method is also the required or preferred method for income tax reporting purposes in the United States.
- Until you write off the receivable, your balance sheet will reflect money you’re unlikely to collect.
- This inconsistency violates the matching principle of GAAP, which aims to provide a more accurate financial picture by aligning expenses with their corresponding revenues.
- By adhering to the matching principle and reflecting the net realizable value of receivables, this method offers a clearer picture of a company’s financial health and performance.

At this point, the company debits bad debt expense and credits accounts receivable for \$500. This entry removes the uncollectible account from the books and records the bad debt expense. However, this method does not comply with GAAP because the bad debt expense is recorded in a different period than the revenue, violating the matching principle. Most of these debts are paid by the customer in a HVAC Bookkeeping timely manner or without a delay. There are two methods to deal with such uncollectible bad debts in bookkeeping; the direct write off method and the allowance method.
At the end of an accounting period, the Allowance for bad debts reduces the Accounts Receivable to produce Net Accounts Receivable. Note that allowance for bad debts reduces the overall accounts receivable account, not a specific accounts receivable assigned to a customer. Because it is an estimation, it means the exact account that is (or will become) uncollectible is not yet known. By using the Percentage of Receivables Method, companies can more accurately match their bad debt expense with the actual risk of uncollectible accounts.
and Reporting
- When the account defaults for nonpayment on December 1, the company would record the following journal entry to recognize bad debt.
- This mismatch can make it challenging to accurately assess a company’s profitability and financial health, as expenses are not properly matched with the revenues they helped generate.
- But, Tally automates the process and makes your accounting process easier regardless of whether you use the direct write off method or the allowance method.
- The percentage of receivables approach is another simple approach for calculating bad debt, but it too does not consider how long a debt has been outstanding and the role that plays in debt recovery.
- This means that at the end of each accounting period, the company will create an account named ‘allowance for doubtful accounts’ and allocate the estimated uncollectible receivables amount to this account.
- While the Direct Write-Off Method is easy to implement, its drawbacks make it less favorable for companies required to adhere to GAAP.
These examples illustrate how the Percentage of Sales Method provides a straightforward way to estimate bad debt expense based on a consistent historical percentage. By applying this method, companies can ensure that their financial statements reflect a more accurate and realistic view of potential losses from uncollectible accounts. GAAP emphasizes the use of the allowance method for estimating bad debt, which involves creating a reserve (allowance) for doubtful accounts based on historical data, current economic conditions, and management’s judgment.
Add a Comment